What Our Brand Mention Programmes Deliver
We document results across B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech programmes. Specific client numbers are shared under NDA. Here are the aggregate patterns and how we measure them.
The Trajectory Documented Programmes Follow
Consistent across verticals. An honest timeline, measured the same way every time.
Pitching velocity
12 to 18 editorial angles reach editor inboxes by the end of Month 2. The pipeline is full before the first placements land.
First placements
2 to 4 confirmed, attributable placements land by Month 3 in the publications your category trusts.
Citation movement
First measurable movement in tracked AI queries by Month 4, with a steady cadence by Month 5.
Every Number Is Attributable
We don’t report impressions or estimated reach.
Results come from programmatic query testing: we run a fixed set of your category prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude on a schedule, and track your citation share against named competitors over time.
Every placement we count is confirmed and traceable. That’s why we can share real numbers privately, and why we don’t need logos to prove the work.
What A Citation Report Actually Contains
Every month, in plain numbers you can check.
Confirmed placements
Every attributable placement that landed, with the outlet, the angle and the link. Not an impression estimate, not a reach figure.
Citation-share movement
Your share of AI answers across the tracked prompt panel, compared to named competitors and to your own starting baseline.
Model-by-model view
Where you gained or lost ground on ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude individually, because they move at different speeds.
Pitch pipeline
Angles in progress and in editor inboxes, so you can see the work before the placements land, not just after.
Verticals We’ve Documented
B2B SaaS
Integration-roundup and comparison coverage that compounds into category citation share.
Fintech
Compliance-aware coverage that earns citations in a high-scrutiny, trust-driven category.
Healthtech
Evidence-aware coverage that holds up to the clinical scrutiny buyers and models apply.
Case Study Questions
We document programme results across B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech engagements. Specific client numbers are shared under NDA on a discovery call, because most clients prefer their citation gains stay private. The aggregate trends are on this page.
Across documented programmes, the pattern is consistent: 12 to 18 pitch angles in editor inboxes by the end of Month 2, 2 to 4 confirmed placements by Month 3, and first measurable citation movement by Month 4, with cadence steadying by Month 5.
Most clients treat their AI-visibility gains as a competitive edge and prefer we don’t name them. We respect that. We’d rather show you real, attributable numbers privately than dress the page in logos.
The documented trajectory is 12 to 18 pitch angles in editor inboxes by end of Month 2, 2 to 4 confirmed placements by Month 3, and first measurable citation movement by Month 4. Editorial coverage compounds, so the curve steepens after the first placements, not before.
We report honestly either way. If the numbers are not moving, we say so and change the approach rather than keep pitching the same angles. Because we cap intake, we have the room to actually fix a programme instead of managing it down.
Where a client is willing, we can arrange a reference conversation on a discovery call. Many prefer to keep their AI-visibility work private, so we lead with attributable numbers you can verify rather than relying on testimonials.
No reputable editorial programme can guarantee specific placements or rankings inside AI answers. We guarantee the work, the pitching velocity, transparent measurement, and honest reporting of every attributable outcome.
Want your own numbers? Get a free audit and we’ll show you where you stand.
Get Your Own Baseline
A free audit shows where your brand is cited across the major assistants today. It’s the first data point in your own case study.